Coastal uplift and tsunami effects associated to the 2010 Mw8.8 Maule earthquake in Central Chile

On February 27, 2010 at 03:34:08 AM an Mw8.8 earthquake, with epicenter located off Cobquecura (73.24°W; 36.29°S), severely hit Central Chile. The tsunami waves that followed this event affected the coastal regions between the cities of Valparaíso and Valdivia, with minor effects as far as Coquimbo. The earthquake occurred along the subduction of the Nazca oceanic plate beneath the South American plate. Coseismic coastal uplift was estimated through observations of bleached lithothamnioids crustose coralline algae, which were exposed after the mainshock between 34.13°S and 38.34°S, suggesting the latitudinal distribution of the earthquake rupture. The measured coastal uplift values varied between 240±20 cm at sites closer to the trench along the western coast of the Arauco peninsula and 15±10 cm at sites located farther east. A maximum value of 260±50 cm was observed at the western coast of Santa María Island, which is similar to the reported uplift associated with the 1835 earthquake at Concepción. Land subsidence values on the order of 0.5 m to 1 m evidenced a change in polarity and position of the coseismic hinge at 110-120 km from the trench. In four sites along the coast we observed a close match between coastal uplift values deduced from bleached lithothamnioids algae and GPS measurements. According to field observations tsunami heights reached ca. 14 m in the coastal area of the Maule Region immediately north of the epicenter, and diminished progressively northwards to 4-2 m near Valparaíso. Along the coast of Cobquecura, tsunami height values were inferior to 2-4 m. More variable tsunami heights of 6-8 m were measured at Dichato-Talcahuano and Tirúa-Puerto Saavedra, in the Biobío and Arauco regions, respectively, to the south of the epicenter. According to eyewitnesses, the tsunami reached the coast between 12 to 20 and 30 to 45 minutes in areas located closer and faraway from the earthquake rupture zone, respectively. Destructive tsunami waves arrived also between 2.5 and 4.5 hours after the mainshock, especially along the coast of the Biobío and Arauco regions. The tsunami effects were highly variable along the coast, as a result of geomorphological and bathymetric local conditions, besides potential complexities induced by the main shock.


Introduction
On February 27 th , 2010, at 03:34:08 local time (UTC -0300), a strong earthquake hit the coast of central Chile.The earthquake occurred along the subduction plate boundary between Nazca and South America, whose convergence occurs at 6.8 cm/year (DeMets et al., 1994;Ruegg et al., 2009).According to the Seismological Service of the University of Chile, the epicenter was localized at 73.24°W and 36.29°S, at 43 km offshore and SW from Cobquecura.The hypocenter was determined at 30 km depth and the calculated moment magnitude (M w ) was 8.8 (www.sismologia.cl;Fig. 1).The along-strike rupture length was initially estimated to be around 500 km, extending from the O'Higgins Region (Punta Topocalma;34.14°S)to the southern part of the Arauco peninsula in the Araucanía Region (Mocha Island;38.41°S),and severely affected the Maule region of central Chile (Madariaga et al., 2010;Farías et al., 2010;Fig. 1).The earthquake's rupture zone covered a region previously characterized as a mature seismic gap (Ruegg et al., 2009), localized mainly between Constitución and Concepción (35°-37°S; Ruegg et al., 2009;Fig. 1).According to the historical reports of Charles Darwin and Captain Robert Fitz Roy during their reconnaissance of the Chilean coast on board the R/V Beagle, the last major subduction earthquake in this area occurred on 1835, with an estimated magnitude of ca.8.5 (Lomnitz, 1971;Beck et al., 1998).This event caused important coseismic uplift of the Arauco peninsula (up to 3 m at the Santa María Island) as well as large tsunami waves that affected the coast of the Biobío region (Fitz Roy, 1836;Darwin, 1840Darwin, , 1846)).During the 20 th century, previous seismic events were the 1928 Talca earthquake, which ruptured a smaller portion along the plate boundary (Lomnitz, 1971;Beck et al., 1998;Fig. 1), and the destructive 1939 Chillán earthquake which has been interpreted as a deeper intra-plate event (Campos and Kausel, 1990;Beck et al., 1998).Thus, the Maule earthquake of February  1835, 1906, 1928, 1960 and 1985 are also shown (Lomnitz, 1971;Beck et al., 1998;Plafker and Savage, 1970;Cifuentes, 1989;Gutenberg and Richter, 1954;Comte et al., 1986;Christensen and Ruff, 1986;Monfret and Romanowicz, 1986;Choy and Dewey 1988;Barrientos, 1988).Tectonic plates convergence vector according Ruegg et al. (2009).
The magnitude of the 2010 Maule earthquake was close to expected on the basis of modeling GPS velocities in the previously defined seismic gap region of south-central Chile (Barrientos, 1994;Ruegg et al., 2009).Based on stochastic modeling of spatiotemporal patterns of historical earthquakes, Barrientos (1994) considered a high probability (41%, 63%) for the occurrence of a great earthquake between 34.3°S and 37.2°S with an estimated maximum magnitude of M w 8.4 occurring in the year 2005±10.Based on GPS measurements obtained between 1996 and 2002, Ruegg et al. (2009) estimated that the southern part of the plate interface along the so-called Constitución-Concepción seismic gap had already accumulated enough strain to produce an M w 8.0-8.5 earthquake.
Few minutes after the Maule earthquake, large tsunami waves affected the coast between Valparaíso and Valdivia (Fig. 1), and strongly impacted the region between Pichilemu (34.39°S;O´Higgins Region) and Puerto Saavedra (38.81°S;Araucanía Region).The earthquake and tsunami caused 486 fatalities in addition to 79 missing persons according to official reports (www.interior.gov.cl;April 2010).In addition, the event caused substantial losses of infrastructure in areas close to the epicenter (ca.USD 30,000 millions, according to the Chilean Government; March 2010).In this region, horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of up to 6 m/s 2 were recorded (up to ca. 60%g; Madariaga et al., 2010).
In this paper, we report measurements and describe methodological aspects related to the assessment of vertical coseismic displacements observed along the coast of central Chile during March 2010.We expand the data set presented in a recent publication (Farías et al., 2010) and we include measurements of tsunami heights between Quintay (33.2ºS;Valparaíso Region) and Niebla (39.8ºS;Valdivia region), together with some observations concerning its effects on the infrastructure as well as on coastal erosion and deposition processes.Thus, the aim of this work is to provide a regional view of the effects of the earthquake and tsunami on the coastal region of south-central Chile.

Coastal uplift and Tsunami Heights Measurements
We based our quantitative measurements of coseismic coastal uplift on coralline algae biomarkers.These estimates were complemented with qualitative observations of belt-forming algae and mollusks representative of the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones, together with the observation of coastal infrastructure and geomorphic features.
Since the pioneer use of biomarkers to estimate coastal uplift in 1835 by Captain Fitz Roy and Charles Darwin (Fitz Roy, 1836;Darwin, 1840;1846), intertidal and subtidal algae and mollusks have been broadly used to quantify coseismic uplift (Plafker, 1964;Johansen, 1971;Lebednik, 1973;Bodin and Klinger, 1986;Castilla, 1988;Ortlieb et al., 1996).Due to the variability that most of these communities exhibit in terms of their exposure to waves, and considering regional and local variations with respect to their vertical distribution in the tidal zone, precise estimates of associated uncertainties is tenuous (Stephenson and Stephenson, 1972;Castilla, 1988;Ortlieb et al., 1996).
We estimated coseismic coastal uplift values associated to the Maule earthquake by measuring the width of the white fringe resulting from exposed lithothamnioids crustose coralline algae.These organisms are widely present in coastal regions of the Pacific Ocean from the poles to the equator (Littler, 1972).These algae can be found attached to the rocks between the subtidal and the lower intertidal zones.The taxonomy of these algae is complex and precludes a rapid determination of genus or species in the field (Meneses, 1993;Castilla et al., 2010).The most obvious lithothamnioids algae recognizable in the field are of reddish/pinkish color (Guiler, 1959) and turn white when suddenly exposed to solar radiation with no permanent humidification, possibly because of calcareous secretions (e.g., Ortlieb et al., 1996).Along the coast of central and northern Chile, these algae are abundant and can be found in different types of rocky substratum (Guiler, 1959;Stephenson and Stephenson, 1972;Meneses, 1986Meneses, , 1993)).As a biomarker of rapid tectonic changes along the coast, the measurement of the belt of bleached coralline algae has been used to estimate coseismic uplift associated to the 1995 Antofagasta earthquake of M w 8.0 in northern Chile (Ortlieb et al., 1996) and also to measure the coseismic uplift associated to earthquakes in southwestern Pacific (Pelletier et al., 2000;Lagabrielle et al., 2003).
Following the methodology described by Ortlieb et al. (1996), we measured the difference in elevation between the upper limit of the white fringe of the crustose coralline algae, corresponding to the former upper limit of its distribution, prior to the earthquake, and the upper limit of the same algae in its reddish/ pinkish state, corresponding to the highest vertical distribution of the living algae after the seismic event (Fig. 2).This difference was taken as an estimate of the coseismic uplift associated to the M w 8.8 earthquake.Through this methodology we obtained direct and locally-representative estimates of coastal coseismic uplift along the entire rupture zone.In this paper, we focus on detailed methodological aspects of this technique and expand a previous dataset (Farías et al., 2010).
Error assessment of uplift measurements varies according local conditions.In the case of the observations made in rocky areas protected from the direct influence of the storm waves, where the limits of the pre-and post-earthquake crustose coralline algae were almost horizontal, we estimated errors between ±10 cm and ±20 cm (Fig. 2).These errors were associated to the width of the band characterizing the transition from the living to the bleached algae, or by the spatial definition of the upper limit of the white fringe.At four sites (Piure, Rumena, Santa María Island and the northern extremity of Punta Lavapié), the measurements were made in areas of great exposure to waves.In those sites we observed large white fringes as the result of both coseismic uplift but also higher wave activity (Fig. 2).In addition, the direct measurement of the difference in vertical distribution between the former and the present upper limits of the algae was difficult in some areas.To take these effects into consideration, larger errors between ±20 cm and ±60 cm, estimated from the observed maximum and minimum heights of the white fringe at a given site were assumed.Thus at such sites, the errors encompass the maximum possible width increment observed in areas directly exposed to the wave activity, between 40 cm (±20 cm) and 120 cm (±60 cm), which is similar to the amount of local increment due to the same phenomena reported by Ortlieb et al. (1996) from Mejillones peninsula.
Evidences of subsidence were observed on the basis of anthropogenic and geomorphologic markers in coastal and estuarine areas.Due to the difficulty to quantify the amount of subsidence in most of these sites, we present qualitative estimates and assigned conservative errors of ±40 cm and ±50 cm, which represent between 40% and 100% of the total estimates.These estimates are based on the observation of submerged terminations of river banks or estuarine terraces, flooded vegetation, submerged trees or piers, and could be partially influenced by compaction phenomena occurred during the earthquake or by erosion processes associated to the tsunami.In spite of that, we report land subsidence estimates from areas where this phenomena affected vast zones.Coastal uplift and tsunami effeCts assoCiated to the 2010 m w 8.8 maule earthquake ...
Local measurements of tsunami heights were conducted in areas directly exposed to the open ocean (Sugawara et al., 2008).We observed the highest pervasive marks left by vegetation razed by the tsunami, traces of erosion on the beach and supralittoral zones, sand and boulder deposits, and destruction provoked by the tsunami (Fig. 3).These measurements were made using a barometric altimeter with 1-m precision or with tape in sea cliffs.In order to estimate tsunami heights with respect to the sea level at the moment of its occurrence, the measurements were corrected by the tide effect according to tidal heights reported by the Navy Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service (Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada, SHOA, Table 1).The precision for these local measurements was 1 m and therefore we assumed an error of ±0.5 m for those observations.Thus, from field observations made between the 5 th and 27 th of March, our data set provides a regional view regarding coseismic vertical displacements associated with the Maule earthquake and tsunami heights along the coast located between Valparaíso and Valdivia (33.2-39.8ºS), the most severely impacted region by those phenomena (Table 2).

Coesismic coastal uplift and subsidence
The results of the measurements of vertical displacements along the coast with respect to their latitudinal distribution are shown in figure 4a and reported in table 2. Vertical displacements were observed between Punta Topocalma (34.14°S) and Tirúa (38.34°S).The greatest coseismic uplift was measured in the Arauco peninsula, where values reached between 133±20 cm (Yane) and 240±40 cm (Piure).Along the western coast of this peninsula, we observed large areas of exposed marine abrasion platforms resulting from coastal uplift during the Maule earthquake, with remains of intertidal algae and mollusk (Fig. 5a, e).As a result of uplift, in some areas the coastline experienced a retreat of several hundreds of meters (max.500 m; Fig. 5b).According to our observations, the coastal area of Lebu experienced coseismic uplifting of 172±10 cm, which caused an abrupt relative descent of the sea level and consequently an abrupt drop in base level of the Lebu River, resulting in desiccation of its channel and some river banks and fluvial terraces (Fig. 5c, d).A similar phenomenon was observed in several estuaries along the western shore of the Arauco peninsula.
Measurements of the upper limit of the bleached lithothamnioids algae with respect to the local tide level at the western coast of the Santa María Island, realized in a rocky coast exposed to the direct influence of wave activity and to the open ocean, evidenced highest coastal uplift of 260±50 cm, which is on the order of the coseismic uplift of 2.4 to 3.0 m reported by the pioneer work of Fitz Roy (1836) and Darwin (1840Darwin ( , 1846) ) after the 1835 earthquake.Lower coastal uplift measurements (between 15±10 cm and 50±10 cm) were observed in small peninsulas located between Punta Topocalma (34.1°S)  and Punta Tumbes (36.6°S), along the coast of the O´Higgins, Maule and Biobío regions in south-central Chile (Fig. 1), northward from the Arauco peninsula (Fig. 4a).Uplift of similar magnitude was measured at Tirúa (38.3°S; <50 cm) and Mocha Island (38.4°S; <50 cm) located south of this peninsula (Fig. 4a), from the observation of bleached and desiccated fringes of algae and other organisms typical of the intertidal zone.From the observation of rocky shore communities, Castilla et al. (2010) assessed the massive mortality of belt-forming intertidal and subtidal species, such as lithothamnioids coralline algae, brown kelp and mussels, produced by the coastal uplift and tsunami that followed the Maule earthquake, estimating uplift values of 2.1-3.1 m at Santa María Island, 1.6 m at Punta Lavapié and 0.2-0.3m at Caleta Tumbes and Mocha Island, which are similar to our estimates (Table 2).Evidences for coseismic land subsidence were observed in places located some kilometers inland from the coastline (Figs. 6 and 7a).These observations comprise submerged quays and piers and flooded beaches, as in Bucalemu (34.6°S), flooded river bars with submerged and flooded trees and swampy vegetation, as along the Llico (34.8°S;Fig. 6a) and Biobío rivers (37°S), and possibly, submerged quays in lakes located close to the coast as the Vichuquén lake (Fig. 6b), and submerged littoral sand bars as in the case of the Mataquito river.The amount of land subsidence was roughly estimated to range between 50 cm and 1 m.
Our estimates of vertical coseismic displacements associated to the Maule earthquake from bleached coralline algae, are consistent with uplift estimated from campaign GPS data in the same region reported by Vigny et al. (2010).The GPS monuments were surveyed three times before the earthquake, in 1996, 1999, and 2002, allowing the determination of stable inter-seismic velocities (Ruegg et al., 2009).The monuments were re-occupied immediately after the earthquake in March 2010.Co-seismic displacements were estimated by comparing the pre-earthquake position of the monuments determined by extrapolation of the 1996-2002 interseismic velocity, with the post-earthquake position.The vertical positions obtained by GPS measurements usually have an instrumental error of the order of 1 cm.In addition, the 1996-2002 interseismic rate has a standard uncertainty of 5 mm/yr, and thus its extrapolation to 2010 results in around 4 cm of error, for the site position immediately before the earthquake.Therefore most vertical co-seismic displacements measured by campaign GPS have an uncertainty of 4-5 cm (Vigny et al., 2010).The comparison between GPS data and our land-level measurements at the same localities (6 in total) agree within uncertainties (Fig. 8).This comparison suggests that uplift values measured from the width of the bleached lithothamnioids algae tend to underestimate the GPS coseismic coastal uplift, probably due to the uncertainty associated to the effect of high waves at sites exposed to the open ocean (Fig. 2c).From a regional point of view, higher coseismic coastal uplifting occurred in areas closer to the trench, whereas coastal regions located eastwards experienced    Coastal uplift and tsunami effeCts assoCiated to the 2010 m w 8.8 maule earthquake ... lower uplift and even subsidence (Fig. 7a).A narrow hinge line for coseismic uplift/subsidence change was globally estimated at 110-120 km from the trench using the land-level changes from the entire rupture zone (Farías et al., 2010).Thus, the reported data are consistent with displacements mostly associated with a coseismic rebound of the continental plate, after an inter-seismic elastic deformation due to the convergence of the tectonic plates, as shown through previous GPS geodetic measurements by Ruegg et al. (2009) in the region.Although the slip distribution along the seismic rupture resulted from a complex process according recent model results (Socquet et al., 2010;Sladen et al., 2010;Lay et al., 2010;Delouis et al., 2010), the M w 8.8 Maule earthquake resulted likely from the accumulation of slip deficit along the Nazca-South American plates contact associated to their convergence at 6.8 cm/year since the last large earthquake on 1835 in south-central Chile (Ruegg et al., 2009;Madariaga et al., 2010;Farías et al., 2010).

Tsunami heights and coastal impact
Results from measurements of tsunami heights along the coast of central-southern Chile are shown in figures 4b and 7b.On February 27 2010, the tidal fluctuation was the highest, among the expected variation during the period.According to a tidal model data reported by SHOA (www.shoa.cl), the tsunami that followed the Maule earthquake occurred at low tide (Table 1).Considering this fact, we corrected the tsunami height values estimated in the field, adding between +0.3 m and +1.2 m, accordingly to each locality (Table 2).Additionally, we computed the tide at the time of our measurements using the TPXO 7.1 global inverse model (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002), and provide an additional correction to refer all our data to mean sea level.
The highest tsunami height was measured at Loanco (35.58°S;Fig. 3), which is situated immediately to the north of Pelluhue (35.84°S;Figs.4b  and 7b), in the Maule region, close to the epicenter.In fact, tsunami height values greater than 8 m were systematically observed between Punta Topocalma (34.14°S) and Tregualemu (35.96°S;Fig. 4b), along the coast of the O'Higgins and Maule regions (Fig. 1).Southwards, we observed a rapid decrease in tsunami heights, as in the coast of Cobquecura, where maximum values of 2-4 m were estimated (Fig. 4b).Farther south, tsunami height values in the order of 7 m were observed at Punta Tumbes (36.62°S;Table 2), close to Talcahuano and Dichato, which are among the most severely impacted localities by tsunami flooding.Tsunami height values around 3-4 m were observed in sites located along the western coast of the Arauco peninsula (Fig. 4b), whereas higher values were measured southwards, at Tirúa (38.34°S; 8 m) and Puerto Saavedra (38.81°S; 7 m).The observed tsunami heights diminished southwards from this locality, along the coast of the Valdivia region, up to 4 m and 3 m measured at Caleta Queule (39.40°S) and Niebla (39.67°S), respectively (Table 2).From Punta Topocalma northwards, we observed a decreasing trend in tsunami height values varying between 6 m at La Boca (33.91°S;O'Higgins Region) and 2.2 m at Quintay (33.19°S;Valparaíso Region).
The latitudinal distribution of maximum tsunami heights exhibits an irregular pattern at local scale, likely as a result of the strong control of the coastal geomorphology and bathymetry on hydrodynamics and wave splash.In fact, maximum tsunami heights were observed at coastal cliffs, whereas lower heights but larger flooded areas and greater impacts were observed in small bays and estuaries, were the tsunami caused partial or complete destruction of houses, dwellings and other infrastructure located along the supralittoral zone.Dramatic tsunami effects  were observed along the coast of the Maule region, especially at Pelluhue, Curanipe and Duao-Iloca (Fig. 9), as well as at Pichilemu in the O'Higgins Region.At Dichato and Talcahuano bays, located in the Biobío region, near Concepción (Fig. 7b), the tsunami flooding reached hundreds of meters inland claiming several lives and causing serious damage to infrastructures (Fig. 10), which differ with respect to the observed reduced effects caused by tsunami inundation in some places situated just beside these localities.
Littoral bars in front of the river mouths, estuaries or lagoons, in some cases with well developed forests, appear to have protected the inner coastal areas from the direct impact of the tsunami.At Puerto Saavedra, which was highly impacted by tsunami flooding after the giant Valdivia earthquake in 1960, we observed marks of impacted vegetation and eroded supralittoral dunes evidencing tsunami heights of 7 m at the western coast of the littoral bar that protects the embayment from the direct influence of the open ocean.Contrarily to what occurred in 1960, when the town experienced strong tsunami inundations that flooded the littoral bar, the 2010 tsunami height reached 2-3 m at the inner coast of the embayment protected by this geomorphologic feature, resulting in an almost null impact on the population and local infrastructure (Fig. 11a, b, c).Similarly, while sand dunes and reinforced harbor infrastructure located on the supralittoral zone of the beach at Llolleo, in the Valparaiso region, protected the lagoon situated at the northern extremity of this area, the southern lagoon was strongly impacted by tsunami waves that arrived from the south, which reached heights of up to 5.5 m resulting in a total destruction of modest dwellings (Fig. 12a).
Tsunami inundations caused important littoral erosion and modified the profile of several beaches (Fig. 11c, d).At several places, the most evident sedimentary deposits associated to the tsunami were sandy-gravel layers of 1-5 cm thicknesses located on the supralittoral zone (Fig. 12b, c), in some cases several hundred of meters inland, overlying organic fine deposits in lagoons and estuaries.The 2010 deposits are similar to tsunami deposits as sand layers within peat and mud sediments in coastal environments as tidal marshes, back-barrier marshes and lagoons reported in other subduction margins (Dawson and Stewart, 2007;Peters et al., 2007).Additionally, we observed increased frequency of boulders in the intertidal and supralittoral zones at the western coast of the littoral bar at Puerto Saavedra, with respect to the situation before the tsunami, according to witnesses reports (Fig. 11c).The latter is comparable to the presence of large boulders left in intertidal and suppralittoral zones by historic tsunamis in other coastal areas as summarized by Dawson and Stewart (2007).These deposits resulted from onshore transport of material during run-up, analogue to present and past examples (Dawson and Stewart, 2007).
During the field survey, several eyewitnesses were interviewed and we selected only those with internal coherence in a given group of persons (N=11 cases).According to these reports, tsunami waves started to impact the coast between 12 and 20 minutes after the mainshock in areas close to the seismic rupture, as in the coastal zones located just north of the epicenter.In areas located outside the rutpure, as in the coast of Quintay and Niebla, in the Valparaíso and Valdivia regions, respectively (Table 2), tsunami waves started to arrive up to 30-45 minutes after the mainshock.According these reports, the fastest arrival of tsunami waves at the coast occurred at Loanco, situated just north of the epicenter.Model results which suggest that most of the coseismic slip associated to the mainshock occurred offshore of the area situated between the northern portion of the Biobío Region and the Maule Region, as well as offshore of the O'Higgins Region (Socquet et al., 2010;Sladen et al., 2010;Delouis et al., 2010;Lay et al., 2010), are consistent with the latitudinal distribution of coastal coseismic uplift, tsunami heights and arrival time of tsunami waves   at the coast reported herein.Some witnesses coincided in three major tsunami waves, which reached the coast at periods of minutes to dozens of minutes between each other.In spite of that, some reports describe the occurrence of renewed tsunami waves at the coast of Biobío and Araucanía regions again between 06 and 08 AM local time (UTC -0300), i.e. 2.5-4.5 hours after the mainshock (Table 2).Additionally, eyewitness reports from Loanco, in the Maule region, indicated the arrival of tsunami waves first from the south and after from the north, suggesting a complex pattern in the occurrence of this phenomena.This is consistent with the complex bilateral rupture mode suggested by the analysis of seismic waves (Lay et al., 2010).

Conclusions
Coseismic coastal uplift associated to the M w 8.8 Maule earthquake of February 27, 2010 was estimated along central Chile on the basis of emerged white fringes of lithothamnioids crustose coralline algae.This method had been used successfully in other subduction earthquakes around the Pacific Ocean.The associated errors range from some centimeters up to several decimeters, and mostly depend on: (i) the regularity of the upper and (ii) lower limits of the white fringe, as well as (iii) the degree of exposure to strong wave activity.Our observations confirmed that the latter is the most important source of error; in areas directly exposed to the open ocean, the observed increment varied between 40 cm and 120 cm.In areas protected from the direct influence of the waves, the error can be less than 10 cm, and thus protected sites should be preferred to measure coseismic uplift.The close match between some uplift values deduced from bleached lithothamnioids with campaign GPS data, support the use of this method for a rapid reconnaissance of seismic ruptures in coastal areas.
Evidence of vertical deformation was observed between Punta Topocalma (34.14°S) and Tirúa (38.34°S), which have been considered as the maximal along-strike extent of the seismic rupture of February 27, 2010.The observed coastal uplift ranged from 15 ±10 cm to 250±60 cm, with higher values along the coast of the Arauco peninsula and Santa María Island.Uplift decreased systematically landward from the trench shifting to subsidence at an averaged distance of 110-120 km from this feature.
Largest tsunami heights, referred to the tides at the moment of the earthquake, were systematically observed in areas located immediately north of the epicenter, as along the coast of Loanco (35.58°S)-Pelluhue (35.86°S),where the tsunami reached up to 14 m.These values decreased progressively northward to 2.5 m south of Valparaíso.In turn, along the coast of Cobquecura, located in front of the epicenter of the mainshock, tsunami heights diminished to 4-2 m.A greater variability in tsunami heights was observed in the Dichato-Talcahuano area and Tirúa-Puerto Saavedra, with values around 6-8 m.Eyewitnesses reported that tsunami waves impacted the coast between 12-20 minutes after the mainshock along the Maule, Biobío and O'Higgings regions, while it reached the coast up to 30-45 minutes after the mainshock in more distant areas such as the coastal regions of Valdivia and Valparaíso.Tsunami flooding strongly affected the coast 2.5-4.5 hours after the mainshock in the Bio-Bio and Araucanía regions.The tsunami impact was highly variable at local scale, as a result of the local geomorphology and bathymetry of the coast and continental shelf, as well as from the main direction of tsunami wave propagation.
The seismic rupture occurred along the tectonic convergence of the Nazca and South American plates and ruptured an area previously characterized as a mature seismic gap, since the predecessor event in 1835.The appropriate generation and consideration of scientific knowledge in Earth Sciences is crucial to prevent the potential impact of large earthquakes in Chile, in particular, and in Andean societies, in general.

FIG. 2 .
FIG. 2. Bleached lithothamnioids coralline algae strip used as a marker of coastal coseismic uplifting.A., B. Pink (living) algae strip and white fringe of the crustose coralline algae observed at Chome and Lebu, respectively; C. White fringe of bleached algae at Rumena, showing increased width in the zone directly exposed to the waves; D. Detail of bleached lithothamnioids algae as a result of coastal coseismic uplift during the 2010 Maule earthquake.

FIG. 3 .
FIG. 3. Strong tsunami effects along the coast of Maule region.A. Littoral zone impacted by tsunami inundation; B. Marks of destroyed vegetation evidencing local tsunami height at Loanco, located northward from the epicenter of the mainshock.
Coastal uplift and tsunami effeCts assoCiated to the 2010 m w 8.8 maule earthquake ...

FIG. 4 .
FIG. 4. Comparison of the latitudinal distribution of coseismic vertical displacements and tsunami heights along southcentral Chile. A. Latitudinal distribution of the coastal coseismic uplift values and subsidence measurements; B. Tsunami height values.
FIG. 6. A. Land subsidence evidenced by flooded fluvial terraces at the Llico River, and B. by partially submerged peers along the margin of the Vichuquén Lake, close to the coast.

Fig. 8 .
Fig. 8.Comparison of coseismic coastal uplift and subsidence estimates from lithothamnioids algae and geomorphologic markers with GPS data from Vigny et al. (2010).The location of sites with uplift estimates from both bleached lithothamnioids algae (crosses) and GPS measurements (diamonds) are also shown (left panel).

FIG. 9 .
FIG. 9. Photographs evidencing strong tsunami impact along the coast of Maule Region.A., B. Littoral area affected by tsunami inundation at Pelluhue and Duao-lloca, respectively; C. Tsunami impact at Curanipe, evidencing a strong effect of erosion processes on foundations of coastal infrastructure.
Location of the epicenter of the M w 8.8 earthquake on February 27 th 2010 (white star in red circle), and of the aftershocks occurred until March 25 th , 2010 (US Geological Service, USGS; Seismological Service from University of Chile).The latitudinal extents of rupture zones of the earthquakes of FIG. 1.

TABLe 2 . FIeLD DATA on TSunAMI HeIGHT AnD LAnD-LeVeL VALueS ASSoCIATeD To THe 2010 Mw8.8 MAuLe eArTHquAke.
w 8.8 maule earthquake ...